This paper focuses on the murder rate within Namibia, and
the development of a Bayesian space-time model to monitor the issue. Namibia, a
developing sub-Saharan African nation, possesses one of the highest murder
rates in the world. In 2006, the murder rate in Namibia was 0.168 per 1000
people which was among the top 6 countries in the world with the highest murder
rates. This is decrease from a murder rate of 0.480 per 1000 people in 1997.
The purpose of this paper was to apply a Bayesian approach
to monitoring changes in the risk of being murdered in the 13 regions of
Namibia over time. Utilizing murder data
between 2002 and 2006, Neema and Bohning developed a Bayesian model to assess
the chances of being murdered over time in the regions. Data was gathered from
uniform crime reports in the Department of Crime Information Unit (CI) of the
Namibian Police.
Neema and Bohning incorporated various factors into their
Bayesian model to assess which potential variable has the greatest impact on
the likelihood of being murdered. The Bayesian model produced the following
posterior mean estimates:
The rate of the overall risk of being murdered is 0.889 per
1000 people with a confidence interval of 0.72 to 1.083 when no random
parameters are included in the model. Additionally, the study concluded that
regional clustering resulted in the greatest amount of variation in the
relative risk of murder (σu=0.683).
The results of the study revealed that the greatest amount
of variation in the relative risk for murder was due to regional clustering,
and that population density was insignificant.
Critique
This study properly used a Bayesian model to identify the
bounds of the relative risk for murder in Namibia; however, the Bayesian model was
not used in a predictive context. Rather than predicting the relative risk
for murder in the future, the study was used to identify the key factors that
may be contributing to murders. Also, this study did not provide a great deal
of evidence supporting its findings. The Bayesian model produced mean estimates
correlated to factors, but Neema and Bohning did not provide any further
support for why regional clustering attributes to a higher likelihood of being
murdered.
Source:
Neema, I. & Bohning, D. (2012). Monitoring murder crime
in Namibia using Bayesian space-time models. Journal of Probability and Statistics, 1-13.
John, this was a different approach to utilizing a BN within the area of intelligence. Although this approach was not predictive within the parameters of this research, it could be used to predict the next region with the highest murder rate. Do you think this methodology is a useful tool for analysts?
ReplyDeleteTo be clear, this research did not expose which regions had the greatest murder rate. The research, through the use of BN, highlighted the areas in which a person is most likely to be murdered.
DeleteI do believe that BN is useful in assessing probabilities.