Matthew Haines
Summary:
In this article, authors C.
Chet Miller and R. Duane Ireland discuss the pros and cons of intuition and its
use in decision making. They begin by describing Honda’s entrance into the
American market and how preliminary analysis was completely contrary to the
endeavor being a success. However, Honda took a risk on its executive’s
intuition and had a huge success in the American Market. The authors then begin
by defining what intuition is saying that at its core there are two types of
intuition, holistic hunches, and automated expertise. Holistic hunches are
judgements that come from a subconscious process involving a synthesis of
diverse experiences, novel combinations of information, and strong feelings of
being right[i].
Automated expertise on
the other hand is a partially subconscious choice. It comes from past
situation-specific experiences and a replay of those experiences.[ii] Then, the authors outline
two specific types of strategies and how intuition can be used within these strategies.
First, exploratory strategies can benefit from holistic hunches because they
can lead to novel ideas and aide in trial and error type testing. Automated
expertise on the other hand can create consistency in an uncertain environment.
Exploitation strategies benefit more from automated expertise because
executives have some sense of factors influencing the decision. However,
holistic hunches also provide a break from the norm and help generate new
ideas.
Critique:
This article did very
little in defining the actual effectiveness of intuition in decision making and
forecasting accuracy. However, the authors do a great job of defining intuition
and how it differs in application. It also cites a number of different studies
on the accuracy of an experts forecasting ability. The authors also show some
of the steps a manager can take to limit the negative effects intuition can
have. I especially liked their recommendations for using holistic hunches to
experiment with business practices that won’t break the bank and to encourage a
culture where failed experiments are ok. These practices lead to better
brainstorming collaborations and help break down some biases people have.
However, I still believe this article did a poor job in taking any kind of stance
on the use of intuition. It could have easily been improved if the authors had
included data on topics other than automated expertise.
[ii] http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=895e0361-0340-4d57-86bb-97800ea8c229%40sessionmgr4009
Source:
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=c1967bb2-7edb-43b1-88a3-488dfa286569%40sessionmgr104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=15841948&db=bth
I have to agree with you Matt, I really like the way the authors broke down the types of intuition (Holistic Hunch and Automated Expertise) and the recommendations they provide to help build effective business practices. Additionally, I got the sense that the author was describing intuition as a process rather than a judgment.
ReplyDeleteI find it interesting that the author brought up intuition in two ways: Holistic Hunch and Automated Expertise. It does make sense that holistic hunches would help lead to exploratory strategies and aid in trial and error testing. While the automated expertise could help with the development of consistency in uncharted waters for a company.
ReplyDeletejqtq1zra
ReplyDeletecialis 100 mg satın al
kamagra jel
cialis 20 mg eczane
viagra eczane
cialis 5 mg satın al
glucotrust official website
sightcare