Introduction:
In this study, the authors investigate the impact that a
course in speed reading might have on three areas of reading proficiency: 1)
general reading comprehension, 2) knowledge of high-frequency vocabulary, and
3) reading-rate development. The subjects were Japanese high school students in
10th grade that enrolled in a six-month course studying English as a
foreign language. The school itself was ranked as slightly below average in
terms of its standardized rank score.
Summary:
The study sought to answer four main questions:
1. Do students who receive speed reading instruction improve
their general reading comprehension more than students who do not receive such
instruction?
2. Do students who receive speed reading instruction improve
their knowledge of high-frequency vocabulary more than students who receive
only vocabulary instruction?
3. Do students who receive speed reading instruction improve
their reading rate while maintaining accuracy in comprehension?
4. Is there a correlation between general reading
comprehension and reading speed?
Of the 105 participants, 51 were randomly assigned to the
experimental group and 54 remained in the control group. Pre- and post-course general reading
comprehension test items assessed reading ability in a number of areas.
For the purpose of the study, speed reading was defined as
follows: reading as quickly as possible while maintaining a high level of
comprehension. Once students had read the passage carefully and recorded their
reading speed, they were not permitted to refer back to the text while answering
the comprehension questions. Comprehension dealt with the understanding of main
ideas and details, and was measured by five multiple-choice response questions
which focused broadly on main ideas, details, and the understanding of
vocabulary from context. At least four out of the five questions needed to be
answered correctly in order to be considered high level.
Over the course of the study the experimental group
completed one speed reading exercise in each class, which was conducted in the
first ten minutes. For the control group, in place of speed reading,
participants received twice-weekly activities that practiced high-frequency
vocabulary. The amount of time spent on these exercises was identical to the
time spent on speed reading in the experimental group. All other aspects of the
courses were identical.
Conclusion:
At the end of the study, the answers to the research questions
were as follows:
1) While both groups made statistically significant
improvements in general reading ability, there was no statistically significant
difference between the post-test means of the experimental group and control
group.
2) Similarly, while both groups made statistically significant
improvements in high-frequency vocabulary, there was no statistically
significant difference between the post-test means of the experimental group and
control group
3) Although students in the experimental group did improve
their reading speed by a statistically significant amount, the study indicated
that students’ comprehension remained constant between the start of the course
and the end of the course.
4) Finally, while general reading comprehension and reading
speed were correlated, the relationship was a small. This means that students
scoring highly on the general reading comprehension test were not always able
to demonstrate faster reading.
Source:
http://www.journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JIER/article/view/6693/6768
Many language tests have timed reading portions. It seems like the small correlation between reading speed and comprehension would mean that language tests should allow test-takers unlimited time
ReplyDelete