Summary
In the article, In the defense of brainstorming: against Lehrer’s New Yorker article, Scott Berkun talks about the method of brainstorming and defends its
uses in the business community. Opposing Groupthink:
the brainstorming myth, the author looks at how brainstorming can be a
useful tool and puts it in the context of the process rather than as a
standalone tool.
Technique
The technique is useful for facilitating group thinking and
coming up with new and perhaps unthought-of of ways of approaching different
scenarios and situations. The author details how a facilitator is necessary to
keep the group on task and to the point. There should also be a great deal of
preparation done in order for it to be effective. This includes; a topic for
ideas around a simple question, invitations to select individuals to join in on
the process and a note in advance in order to give people time to think ahead.
A criticism
free environment should be implemented in order to get the best out of the
participants. The facilitator should then introduce the problem that needs to
be solved to those involved. Participants should explain their idea and why it
is necessary and others should feel free to oppose or build on those ideas –
always stating why in order for progression. Once the brainstorming session is
over – the ideas should be revisited and discussed in more detail.
Strengths
- · It is designed for a volume of ideas
- · Useful for a wide variety of situations
- · Once done can be easily expanded
- · It is easy and requires little preparation
Challenges
- · May be easy to get off topic
- · Critics can make it hard to stimulate ideas
- · It is only a small part of a larger process
- · People should know each other beforehand. Strangers make it hard to stimulate discussion and ideas.
Conclusions
Brainstorming has many critics and it is hard to measure its
utility. There are a number of arguments for and against it. However, it is
simple to implement and if the preparation and right conditions are there then
it is a great tool for generating a lot of ideas – no matter how good they are –
for later discussion and use.
Bibliography
Berkun, Scott. In the defense of brainstorming: against Lehrer’s New Yorker article;
http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2012/in-defense-of-brainstorming-2/
No comments:
Post a Comment