Introduction:
The authors
suggest in their study that using a creativity support tool to encourage small amounts of
individual preparation prior to a group brainstorming session results in more
structured use of the time.
Summary:
Bao, Gerber, Gergle and Hoffman created an online tool
called Momentum to deliver short answer questions to participants of a
brainstorming team each day of the week prior to the session. The questions are
intended to be open and somewhat unexpected in order to encourage thinking
about the brainstorm topic in unusual ways.
Momentum is a web-based system that generates a series of
textual prompts based on a given brainstorm topic. Prompts can be modified
before they are sent by e-mail to all group members at specified intervals in
the days leading up to the brainstorming session. Group members are asked to
quickly and individually respond to the prompts with text messages or photo
attachments. These replies are stored in the system until the start of the
brainstorming session, at which point all responses are unveiled as a
large-scale visualization visible to the entire group.
During the brainstorming session, the answers given from
the pre-session prompts are clustered so that all answers are at least
partially visible on a digital background. The prompts can be accessed by the
participants during the brainstorming session.
The experiment included a group that received pre-session
prompts and a similar group who did not receive any prompts. Both groups came
up with an equal number of new ideas; however, the group who used prompts were
able to stay on target during the session. The prompt group also used several
brainstorming strategies during their session. The prompts also aided the group
in using storytelling and visualization during the session, speeding up the
process.
Conclusion:
Results suggest that participants who used Momentum found
it useful for maintaining task focus and providing inspiration during group
brainstorms. Although Prompted and Unprompted groups performed similarly
according to traditional metrics such as the quantity and quality of ideas, the
researchers observed unique patterns in their use of time and idea creation
processes. Prompted groups were quick to generate quality ideas and largely
avoided unrelated discussion. Even though storytelling was accompanied by
idea creation in both Prompted and Unprompted groups, the shift from story to idea
appeared to be quicker for the former, especially with the aid of the
visualization.
Source:
Bao, P.; Gerber,
E.; Gergle, D.; & Hoffman, D. (2010). Momentum: Getting and Staying on
Topic During a Brainstorm. CHI 2010,
April 10-15, 2010, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://collablab.northwestern.edu/patti/pubs/CHI2010-BaoEtAl-Momentum.pdf
Did the study say how much quicker the prompted group generated ideas? Was it worth the time to use Momentum, or did it even out?
ReplyDeleteIt evened out in the end, but for the first 15 minutes, Momentum seemed to help the group stay on track and get going with initial ideas.
ReplyDelete