Friday, October 14, 2016
Evolving
Optimal and Diversified Military Operational Plans for Computational Red
Teaming
Summary:
This
journal article uses multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) on
Computational Red Teaming (CRT) to increase diversity of near-optimal
alternative strategies in the decision variable space. CRT is the
computerization of Red Teaming through the use of agent-based models for
application toward a given battlefield. The Red team tries to break the Blue’s
defensive strategy, and for their experimentation the scientists used two case
study approaches that use diversity-enhancement schemes (DES) to increase the
diversification of MOEAs.
- Covered in the first part of the
study the scientists expressed the recent literature of CRT, which is an
agent-based system (ABS) that mimics and simulates intricate models of
warfare. Similar programs include ISAAC/EINSTein, WISDOM, and MANA. The
advantage of using these models the scientists point out is that their
low-resolution in their simulation models can produce many various
simulations with many properties. That can then be searched by analysts
for particular techniques and models that interest them. Included in this
section are the plethora of mathematical operations and equations included
in MOEAs to carry and develop the results from population-based stochastic
search heuristics created from real phenomena in nature.
- Following the literature review came
the methodology where the researchers used an evolutionary framework that
included 1) a model generator; 2) a simulation engine that usually
generates 30 repetitions for each simulation model; and 3) an evolutionary
algorithm that generates results for model specification files. Added to
these steps for this research paper was the diversity enhancement scheme
(DES) which focuses the evolutionary search focuses, “1) to preserve and
promote the non-dominated solutions to exploit Pareto optimal solutions,
and 2) similarly, the solutions which contribute to the aggregated, in
both decision and objective, space diversity are also preserved/promoted”
(Zeng, Decraene, Low, Zhou, & Cai 2012).
- By the experimentation point, the
scientists did two case studies where Red strikes Blues defensive
strategies in an urban ops scenario and a maritime anchorage protection
scenario. Included in the measuring of these case studies was the DES and
MOEAs to assess similarities and differences in the selected MOEAs of DES,
Niching, HypeE, NSGAII, and SPEA2.
- It was found that DES and Niching
were the best MOEAs showing significant indicators of Pareto optimal
solutions and solution diversification, with DES taking the lead of the
two.
Concluding
it all the researchers in their conclusion found that most research conducted
using MOEAs has used Pareto-optimality as the focus and neglect the area of
diversification of solutions within the decision variable space. Thus limiting
choices a decision maker has when applied to real world problems. Through the
DES research applied in this research study, the researchers give the ability
to diversify the decision space without compromising the Pareto-optimality.
Thus allowing more room and information for a decision maker to make a more
informed decision and conclusion that is likely to be positive than negative.
Critique:
The
usage of red teaming can be a useful modifier when it comes to needing to
produce more realistic analysis and give a decision maker a more rounded brief
that he can make the best decision for. Yet, in the modern day as this study on
using MOEAs on CRT, we face a more technologic based model that is more reliant
on technology, particularly when it comes to the cyber domain. Therefore, the
application of CRTs gives access to the ability to run an exponential amount of
simulations that analysts can use to produce more informed briefs for a
decision maker, and speed up the intelligence process. Though this exercise in
the research study was more of a War Gaming view, it none the less covers the
notion that it is no longer analysts that work on teams or red teams solely. It also
puts the computer programs that aid in the ability to produce data to also part
take in similar exercises increasing the number of simulations and decreasing
the likelihood of a potential estimates failing. Of course, intelligence is
still an imperfect profession and art, but the use of red teaming can reduce,
particularly through the use of CRT and technology, the uncertainty for a
decision maker.
Sources
Zeng, F., Decraene, J., Low, M. Y.
H., Zhou, S., & Cai, W. (2012). Evolving optimal and diversified military
operational plans for computational red teaming. IEEE Systems Journal, 6(3),
499-509. <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suiping_Zhou/publication/258655766_Evolving_Optimal_and_Diversified_Military_Operational_Plans_for_Computational_Red_Teaming/links/5536541d0cf268fd00171fd6.pdf>.
Roland, although I doubt it was mentioned in the study, I am curious if you uncovered in your research any information about how much software like this costs?
ReplyDeleteHank they didn't mention that cost, but they went in depth with the mathematics behind it all. I could look up later on to see what projected prices would be to try and satisfy your curiosity.
ReplyDelete